You can find out more at www.stephenwestshow.net. This type of reasoning is absolutely foundational to future philosophers’ work in areas that might be more relevant to our lives today, such as economic and political theory.But it’s not just the exploration of the ideas that makes.I have two main criticisms of this book. Philosophy has a reputation of being really dense, dry, and esoteric. In chronological order, the thinkers and ideas that forged the world we live in are broken down and explained. To learn more about the great philosopher and economist Adam Smith from those who are (including himelf, he’s an excellent and compelling writer), and for more about the philosophical traditions that influenced him and which he influenced in turn, see:Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.View ordinaryphilosophy’s profile on Facebook,View ordinaryphilosophy’s profile on Instagram,View amycools/ordinary-philosophy’s profile on Pinterest,View UCSMZN1e0uc9XsET-liJKDqA’s profile on YouTube,View 104522315164143984354’s profile on Google+,A version of this piece was previously published in Ordinary Philosophy.Any support you can offer will be deeply appreciated!Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License,Say What?
podcast) out.The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Collective Misunderstanding.To Hell With Politeness (and With the Stranger Next Door). He is, like West, extremely hardworking and self-effacing. Just For Fun. Not even a few words on what happens next and where these ideas end up going. One example is Democritus’ theory of atoms in ~400 BC. Arts & … And many of his interviews with world-class academics are gems in their own right.the content cannot help but be occasionally less than one would want on a particular subject.I would say he doesn't pretend that it is. Making Philosophy Accessible. David Hume, Adam Smith, and their fellow leaders in the Scottish Enlightenment joined the ranks of this philosophical tradition’s greatest and most influential thinkers.This is only a very short summary of Smith’s moral philosophy by one who is by no means an expert. Youtube: "philosophyTube" or "crash course philosophy" Others: "existentialcomics" and a graphic novel called "logicomix".All have their strengths and weaknesses, but they are all good stepping stones into philosophy.Crash course philosophy and philosophytube I would recommend against- Crash course philosophy is so reductionist often it flat out lies. It's easy for us academics to say 'we got our PhDs from here or there, studying in nice, comfortable rooms.' the merits of charter schools or big businesses).Great podcast!
podcast. I've never heard it but the consensus seemed to be that it's very informative but a bit dry. The only Cons I can think of are that because it's such an individualistic approach, he might not be to everyone's taste; plus, philosophy is such a huge topic with so many interrelated strands that the content cannot help but be occasionally less than one would want on a particular subject. I went to the Philosophize This! and I like that he starts from the beginning.He’s great! Philosophize This! On one hand, it’s pretty understandable since the content itself is good and there may be readers of the book who don’t follow the podcast, but on the other, I’d like to see a higher proportion of original content and further analysis.My complaints are relatively small and don’t break the book by any means.To close out, I’d like to leave the book’s dedication here, which is really reflective of West’s educational and inspirational vision of philosophy:This book is dedicated to the three things I cherish most in this world:I think that’s pretty awesome. Clearly, you can't. This is a pretty interesting insight granted that the first telescopes appeared around 1600 AD. In a nutshell, Democritus reasoned that things can be split into smaller and smaller pieces, but not forever. Hello everyone, I'm Stephen West and this is Philosophize This! He currently resides in Seattle, WA. My students quite like it. Listening to a podcast is so much clearer and more entertaining, and as a result, I find that the knowledge is better retained and the overall effect on one’s thinking is stronger.In conclusion: great book despite the abrupt ending, and I highly recommend checking it (and the Philosophize This! episodes free, on demand. The first is that it ends very abruptly after explaining and contextualizing the basics of Aristotle’s philosophy. Beginner friendly if listened to in order! 195.1k Followers, 678 Following, 4,742 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Stephen West (@westknits) I look forward to every episode and often go back and re-listen old ones. At some point, there must be a unit of existence which can no longer be cut — an atom, from ‘a’ (not) and ‘tomos’ (divisible). For anyone interested in an educational podcast about philosophy where you don't need to be a graduate-level philosopher to understand it. In chronological order, the thinkers and ideas that forged the world we live in are broken down and explained. No one seemed to have an issue with the content.Compared to 'philosophy without any gaps', it's a laugh a minute.I came to this thread because I listened to a couple episodes, but in those few I’ve had issues.No one seemed to have an issue with the content.Specifically episode 91 that covers Nietzsche’s “will to power” concept. Adam Smith statue on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh, Scotland,Smith was baptized and perhaps born on June 5th, 1723 in Kirkcaldy, Scotland (a fishing village near Edinburgh) and died on July 17, 1790 in Edinburgh. Podcast. Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments merges from a sort of compendium of elements of moral philosophy, in which Smith fuses what he considers the best and most coherent elements of moral philosophy into one compelling system. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts,Social, Political and Feminist Philosophy. Education. In actuality, these ideas are all quite groundbreaking. … But Adamson also brings a lot to the table.
He says it has nothing to do with physical power or power in the sense of great warriors- which completely ignores that Nietzsche believes virtues like heroism and courage on the battlefield arose in ancient societies.But in an entire episode on the topic, none of this is touched on.